Showing posts with label physical. Show all posts
Showing posts with label physical. Show all posts

BLOODWORK - Currently in Development

 


A collaboration between Jens Rasmussen and Lucy Flournoy. After years of working together on various projects, BLOODWORK emerged from discussions around what audiences will need on the other side of the pandemic. The next developmental phase will happen in the Spring of 2021. 

SEEN BY/EVERYONE - Talkin' Broadway Review

Everything about the production works.


You might expect Seen / By Everyone, the new work at HERE by the collective known as Five On A Match, to be a comic satire, drawing as it does from actual postings on various forms of social media. Even the physical setting, a karaoke bar with the audience members seated at club tables on two sides of the performance space, suggests a fun evening of catty eavesdropping. Surprisingly, however, what unfolds through disjointed conversations (its creators refer to it as a "collage" rather than a play) is an emotionally powerful portrait of love and loss, and of individuals coming to grips with both. 

 Kudos, to begin with, to the members of Five On A Match (Matthew Cohn, Amir Darvish, Meg MacCary, Enormvs Muñoz, and Jen Taher) for both the tremendous amount of effort they must have put in to pull together a coherent whole from the world of sources available to them. And even more plaudits for the respect with which they have treated the revelatory material, representative of real if unidentified people trying to make sense of their lives in the public forum of social media. 

 The bar where the evening unfolds is called Acheron, named for the mythological "river of pain" across which souls are ferried to the underworld. Two of these souls, each of whom has died suddenly and unexpectedly, are seated at, or, in the case of one of them, sprawled across the bar among the living mourners. The conversations that unfold around them tell of shock, pain, fear, and longing over the deaths, as well as other stories of loneliness and failed relationships.

Fortunately, not all is unrelentingly bleak. There are touches of humor, foolishness, self-indulgence, bar gossip, and karaoke singing to mitigate the core of sadness. The production is also blessed with a pitch perfect cast that includes the members of Five On A Match, along with another half dozen performers, almost all of whom are experienced Equity actors. They have done an excellent job of developing their characters out of the raw material of Twitter, Facebook, and other messaging sites, so that we are able to differentiate among them and follow their separate story lines through the evening. 

Everything about the production works because everything has been carefully planned, down to the monogramed matchbooks, flowers, and candles on the café tables, along with the physical movement of the cast members across the stage, the selection of the karaoke numbers and appropriately non-professional singing, as well as Oana Botez's costumes, Ray Sun Ruey-Horng's video projections, and Christopher Heilman's set design. All told,Seen / By Everyone decidedly rises above its non-linear performance roots to tell an emotionally honest and compelling story that sticks in the mind long after viewing it. 

Theatre Review by Howard Miller - June 7, 2016

Teaching Movement for Performers

One of my great joys is teaching movement.

After strength and control, my curriculum focuses on helping students fully inhabit their bodies. On this foundation students then learn to listen to, and with, their bodies. Finally the students advance to using their bodies as expressive instruments.

The class in the video below spent four hours in my movement studio learning my exercises. After learning the song in their musical theatre class we took 90 minutes to build and rehearse this piece which was then performed for this recording immediately after.

NY Times Review: Alexandra Collier’s ‘Underland’ Mines Rich Performances

Jens Rasmussen and Georgia Cohen
Anyone who has ever lived in a deadly dull town will understand why two bawdy-mouthed Australian schoolgirls dig a hole to China in Alexandra Collier’s “Underland.” It’s the only way out, they decide, from stone-quarry country. But they’re bad at geography, so the nice man who crawls out of their tunnel one day is from Tokyo. Back at school, the girls’ physical education teacher turns into a crocodile.

Ms. Collier, who is Australian-born and New York-based, has created six vivid, droll characters. In Terra Nova Collective’s polished production of “Underland” at 59E59 Theaters, Mia Rovegno has directed six assertive, beautifully delineated performances. The meaning of the play, however, is swathed in enough metaphor to suffocate Samuel Beckett.

Some motives are obvious. The tunnel diggers, Violet and Ruth (Angeliea Stark and Kiley Lotz), seek escape, sometimes through drugs. Taka (Daniel K. Isaac), the Japanese visitor, just wants to go home, as soon as someone brings him a glass of water, please. His Tamagotchi pet dies.

The teachers are less transparent. Miss Harmony (Georgia Cohen) is new in town, and no one can figure out why she’s there. Mr. B (Jens Rasmussen), whose instructional style suggests Marine boot camp, is also literally a killer. There are sightings in town of a real crocodile, but maybe it’s just Mr. B after his nighttime transformation.

Mrs. Butterfat (a very funny Annie Golden), though, appears to be the theme-speaker, while talking to her dead husband, Glen. “Crocs. They’re just down there, waiting,” she says. She dismisses a divine-retribution explanation of why so many locals are dying: “It’s not God; it’s the land. It’ll swallow you whole.” Aha! Living in a horrible place can eat your soul.

Rasmussen... as ruggedly, athletically entrancing as he is dangerous

Jens Rasmussen and Angeliea Stark
Underland, director Mia Rovegno and playwright Alexandra Collier's new play on stage now at 59E59 Theaters, starts as any coming-of-age teen story might. Two girls, Violet and Ruth, clad in school uniforms, light up a joint behind their school, share gossip and insults and curse words, brag about how little they care, and plot their escape from the humdrum, backwater Australian town in which they live. The rest of the play’s backbone is similarly recognizable: a beautiful young art teacher, Miss Harmony, comes into town and wants to inspire the students, catching the eye of the world-weary, cynical gym teacher Mr. B. But then the familiar façade begins to slip, and the crass but endearing normalcy of the high school scene quickly gives way into something far more sinister and dark, as this coming-of-age tale in the outback spirals into a backwoods nightmare. A Japanese businessman crawls out of a hole that Violet and Ruth had been digging out behind the school, and people start turning up dead in the gaping quarry.

Georgia Cohen is naively sweet as the fresh-faced, hopeful Miss Harmony; it’s understandable why both the younger and older generations are drawn to her. Violet, played with convincing teenage angst by Angeliea Stark, falls for her in a big way, in part because Miss H encourages her artistic ability and gives her a camera, suggesting that her art could be her escape to somewhere new. Mrs. Butterfat also falls for her, recognizing her younger self in the woman. Annie Golden's portrayal of this unapologetically eccentric religion teacher -- who doesn’t seem particularly religious at all -- may be the highlight of the play, in part because she’s laughable in her oddball ways, from carrying on conversations with her long dead husband to zipping up her bright yellow windbreaker and heading out on long bike-rides in the dark of the night. She does her best to help Daniel Isaac’s very lost businessman Taka, and console Kiley Lotz’s confused and fearful Ruth, but they may be beyond saving. Her vigilance and endless quirks might be what it takes to survive in a desert town of extremes, from the scorching heat to the frigid cold of night, where crocodiles roam the streets and from which it seems there may be no escape.

In true horror story tradition, supernatural forces jar loose to wreak havoc and seem poised to drag us all down to hell, or at least to far, far away places. Yet it isn’t all impossible, and part of Underland’s depth is its ambitious commitment to remaining a vague, unsettling allegory about the things that are out to get girls alone at night and the terrifying allure of monsters. As Mr. B, Jens Rasmussen plays this ambiguous role well, and with surreal choreography that adds elegance and seduction to the play’s threats, he is as ruggedly, athletically entrancing as he is dangerous.

The intimate scale of the space makes way for Elisheba Ittoop's sound design, which pairs the natural, sans-microphone vocal performances with eerie a capella lullabies, the insidiously maddening drone from the quarry creeping throughout, from a subtle background hum to a piercing shriek. Burke Brown’s lighting and Gabriel Hainer Evansohn’s set design create a space that transforms through subtle, powerful shifts, from the metallic, prison-like confines of the schoolyard to a suggestion of the incongruously vast, beautiful expanse of the outback's open sky.

These elements weave together into an impressively immersive environment that is, in a word, scary. But Underland is the best kind of scary. It's the kind of scary that's so hard to describe but so easy to recognize. It's the kind of scary that you don't notice at first, that creeps in around the edges, capable of capturing the audience in its jaws and swallowing them whole.

by Emily Galwak for Stage Buddy

Jens Rasmussen is quite striking

Jens Rasmussen & Georgia Cohen
It's not often that a playwright sets out to mystify an audience as resolutely as Alexandra Collier does in Underland. The setting is "a small, dusty town in the middle of Australia," and believe me, this Underland is no wonderland. Drought conditions prevail. There are warnings about crocodiles, reportedly moving ever closer to town in search of water. People have a way of turning up dead or disappearing altogether. And what about the man who staggers on stage at the opening, looking disturbed and pulling a bloody tooth from his mouth?

Following this ugly display, the play switches gears, focusing for a while on Ruth and Violet, a pair of adolescent girls who dabble in smoking pot and gossiping maliciously about everyone they know. Violet is the prettier, more dominant one, to whom Ruth anxiously kowtows, but they make a perfectly matched pair of hellions, amusing themselves by sitting in the back of art class and making annoying meowing sounds while their new teacher tries to introduce herself.

The teacher, Miss Harmony (Collier favors names right out of Restoration comedy), is new to town; in one of the play's sharpest, funniest passages, her easygoing, let's-be-friends manner is contrasted with the scalding, hard-ass approach of the gym and math teacher, Mr. B. ("You're like flaccid wombats, the lot of you," he says, offering his own special brand of motivation.) It's not long before a little B-Harmony romance is in the air; at the risk of giving away too much, let's just say that she discovers that passion has its price.

Then there's Taka, a Japanese salaryman sitting in his Tokyo office, listening to exercise audios and playing with his tamagotchi, a tiny little digital pet that, in this case, meows like a kitten. He finds a hole in his floor and, getting inside, begins crawling along it until he exits -- in the Australian town inhabited by Ruth, Violet, et al.

As Ruth and Violet, Kiley Lotz and Angeliea Stark offer hair-raisingly accurate portraits of the kind of sullen, rebellious adolescent who makes one think fondly about reviving corporal punishment, but each of them gradually reveals layers of uncertainty that make them more than just caricatures. Jens Rasmussen is quite striking as the furious, tough-talking Mr. B., who harbors a powerful, all-consuming passion for Miss Harmony, and is also in possession of a terrible secret.

-Read the whole review by David Barbour at Lighting & Sound America

People You Should Know... Jens Rasmussen


An UNDERLAND interview by Zack Calhoon, originally posted on his site


UNDERLAND at 59E59

When did you know that you wanted to be an actor?
 
I had one of those magical Catholic high school choir teachers who loved Rod Stewart, believed in me, and gave me opportunities to grow. If it hadn't been for her - I shudder to think what might have become of this boy from Oshkosh with buck teeth and a Lego obsession.

Tell me about UNDERLAND. How do you feel rehearsals are going? What do you love most about the show?

UNDERLAND is wonderful. It's part Jerusalem, part Mean Girls, with a dash of Alice in Wonderland and Frankie and Johnny in the Clair de Lune. Rehearsals have been an absolute joy. Mia runs a beautiful room and brought together an amazing group of artists. Every designer and every actor has impressed me. I'd be excited to do any project with this group of artists. What I'm loving most about the show right now, is the moments we're building that bend time and space, in surprising, and I hope, compelling ways.

What kind of writing inspires you?

I adore writing that feels natural yet elevated and Ally's writing has this kind of muscular lyricism. My absolute favorite experiences in the theatre is when a piece moves me, and yet I can't verbalize why. Then I know the writer has peeled back a layer of my experience at the very edge of my understanding. It's exhilarating and maybe a little scary.

Who or what has been the biggest influence on your work as an actor thus far?

I think of actors like Michael Lague, who I looked up to when I was an apprentice over 20 years ago, or Michael Chekhov's writing, which I went back to over and over again, or brilliant actors like Mark Rylance, whose work constantly inspires me. But oddly enough, at this point. I think students have influenced my work the most. It's really true that teachers learn and students teach. Being in a studio with young actors has been a great facilitator to my own understanding of my work and process, as well as a tremendous source of inspiration.

What else are you working on right now?

In addition to UNDERLAND at 59E59, I'm in pre-production for THE LITTLE PRINCE which I'll be directing this summer in Georgia, and doing initial prep for A WINTER'S TALE which I'll be performing in at the Notre Dame Shakespeare Festival.

New York Times Feature

Jens Rasmussen
Photo by Julie Glassberg for The New York Times

Teaching City Dwellers How to Make It in the Wilderness


Jens Rasmussen is an actor who is equally adept on the Shakespearean stage and in the great outdoors.
So on the side, instead of waiting tables, he teaches backwoods skills, including lessons on how to start your own campfire from flint and steel. Put away those matches, city slicker, and learn to cook outside on the open flame, right in the middle of the city.
Mr. Rasmussen, who grew up in Wisconsin, does this on the waterfront across the East River from Midtown Manhattan, in a narrow lot in Greenpoint, Brooklyn, at the edge of Newtown Creek, under the Pulaski Bridge.
It is the home of the North Brooklyn Boat Club, of which Mr. Rasmussen is a founding member. Last Sunday, he pointed to an assemblage of tan bricks at the water’s edge and said, “This is our hearth.”
His students — Victor Calvo and Amreen Quadir, both internists at Methodist Hospital in Brooklyn — sat on a thick wooden plank between a chain-link fence topped with razor wire and a concrete wall covered with colorful graffiti tags.
The doctors, who are engaged, told Mr. Rasmussen they had booked the lesson partly to learn some skills “in case, in the future, we do Doctors Without Borders-type work and the bus breaks down — that kind of thing.”
Dr. Quadir saw Mr. Rasmussen’s Groupon listing offering a workshop (at $100 per person) for “Fire Crafting on a Wilderness Adventure” teaching “how to build fires in the wilderness before you cook a delicious campsite dinner.”
That is how they wound up spending a frigid Sunday afternoon cutting vegetables with woodsman’s knives, and then whittling curly shavings from wood slats for fire-starting. They were instructed by the theatrical Mr. Rasmussen, who seemed impervious to the cold, as he doffed his tan rancher’s jacket and tended the camp, wearing a smart outfit of heavy woolen Army-surplus garments.
“Now, if the chips were down, and you really needed to start a fire,” he said, and he went about demonstrating how to elicit a spark, briskly swiping a stone against a piece of iron.
Soon, Dr. Calvo was coaxing sparks from his stone, and had his flammable char cloth smoldering. He then pushed this into a ball of shredded newspaper and blew sharply upon it. When it blossomed into flame, Dr. Calvo dropped the fiery handful into the fire pit and heaped those wood shavings atop.
Mr. Rasmussen fed the crackling fire from a big pile of urban-foraged kindling — old packing crates and castoff scraps from local businesses — and he put a blackened coffeepot on the grill over the leaping flames.
He stoked the fire and the conversation, poured the pair a cup of tea, and began readying the meal on a rough-hewed wooden plank that served as his outdoor kitchen counter. He put a pan on the grill and heated some olive oil and spices, then some vegetables and finally some rice and beans. Then he whipped up a batter of sourdough and cornmeal to deep-fry some hush puppies in a Dutch oven full of hot oil.
Self-reliance is the theme here. Mr. Rasmussen wore around his neck a woodsman’s knife from Sweden in a leather sheath with copper rivets he tooled himself. He cooked with wooden utensils he carved himself, and pulled materials from a woodsman’s basket that he made by felling a black ash tree in Maine. And that ax, he made the handle. And that wanigan wooden box he kept opening for supplies? Made that, too.
Mr. Rasmussen, who is married and lives nearby in Greenpoint, said he grew up partly on a farm near Oshkosh, in a “back-to-the-land kind of family.”
“We have a nature deficiency here in New York City, and so there’s a real profound connection when we participate in these elemental experiences,” said Mr. Rasmussen, who has spent weeks at a time sleeping in the woods, survivalist-style. “With this, we’re tapping into something that goes back millennia and connects us with our ancestors.”
The doctors cut some apple slices, which Mr. Rasmussen dipped into flour and batter to make apple fritters in the hissing and spitting pot of boiling oil.
He sat the couple near the fire to “discuss the priorities of survival” should the city one day descend into chaos. Building a fire could help provide drinkable water, a safe sleeping spot, heat and food, he said, pulling out a pocket survival pack that included a sewing kit and dental floss for stitching wounds.
By dusk, the spot had become a chuck wagon scene. The falling snow hissed as it hit the fire.
After eating, the doctors headed back to civilization, and our urban pioneer poured out his cowboy coffeepot into the campfire, dousing the flames till next time.

By Corey Kilgannon

Rasmussen... projects bone-deep familiarity and intimacy



According to Wednesday's Washington Post, when the sand tiger shark is pregnant, the multiple male offspring in her womb must engage in a “cannibalistic battle for primacy in utero, with only one surviving.”

Well, you can start to imagine how it feels in that cutthroat shark womb at Studio Theatre's new offering, Pas de Deux (the ballet term for duet). Because while we go in expecting two one-act plays on the combativeness of love, in the end, one play completely devours its feeble companion.

Under the fast-paced direction of Eric Ruffin, the clear victor is Daniel MacIvor’s 2-2 Tango, an ebullient and witty dance piece about the fears and delights of hooking up, played out between Alex Mills and Jon Hudson Odom, both of whom perform like they were cloned Jurassic Park style out of the amber-locked DNA of Mikhail Barishnikov, Fred Astaire, Gregory Hines and James Bond.

Jim and James emerge in identical tuxes bearing identical beaming grins. With grace and fluidity in every expression, they proceed to savage what we all know as the 21st century mating process, laying it out in all its self-sabotaging, neurotic glory.

It's the kind of dance piece I suspect people who claim to "hate musical theater" might love.

Unfortunately, you can't get to Tango which occurs after the intermission, until you've sat through its far weaker sibling, Skin Tight by New Zealand playwright Gary Henderson.

Skin Tight draws its title from a line about “sliding the blade through the tight skin” of an apple — a chops-licking image straight out of Eden, if ever there was one.

Things begin promisingly enough, with a loud, Keith Moon-esque drum solo smash of man and woman. Tom and Elizabeth fight with their entire bodies, swinging, rolling around, spanking, slopping on each others’ faces. It’s visceral and, well, kinda hot.

So kudos to the fight choreography — acrobatic, aerobic — which is unquestionably gorgeous. (So, incidentally, is the lighting design by Jedidiah Roe.)

After tussling for a bit, Tom and Elizabeth take a breather, both gulping from buckets of water, panting. Then back they go. It is the mystery around these two smooching gladiators that heightens the excitement for what's to come as we watch.

But then the dialogue begins, and it all goes downhill (so to speak, as the set piece is a green hill!) from there.

As they talk about their many years together, a lot of it revolving around sex — “I was worried it wouldn’t fit, until I saw it,” she says of their first time, something every man wants to hear— the lack of specificity and cohesion to the story begins to try our patience.

Which has nothing to do with the capable (and brave) actors behind Tom and Elizabeth, Jens Rasmussen and Emily Townley, whose project a bone-deep familiarity and intimacy with one another most affectingly through movement, as when she shaves him or he washes her hair.

While their closeness is evident physically, the dialogue holds us at arms length, down one well-trod path after another. There are infidelities. There’s a far-off war. There’s an estranged child. There are old-timey folk songs.

Oh, and there are endless agrarian metaphors. Like how farmland is a place where “man could set his ghosts free” or how as you age, “your rivers get parched.” By the time the end finally arrives, you’ve been anticipating it for awhile.

Although there are fewer words spoken in Tango, and the content is markedly lighter, somehow Jim and James' story resonates truer.

There’s the “Indepen-dance,” an ode to maintaining singlehood. There’s the moment Jim and James meet, and how their sentences overlap like music. How, while doing the Hustle, the introductions turn awkward (“My father was a monster,” Jim blurts).

In the style of “Singing in the Rain’s” or “Moses Supposes,” many of the pieces are purely there to have fun with language. There’s the orgasmic “oh” that punctuates the word tango, or the cheerleader-style spelling of “very attractive.”

“I prefer not to see me being seen,” James says, setting up the night’s best gag—a consummation scene with clap on/clap off lights. (As my friend pointed out, how could the makers of that invention have known of its destiny, here in 2013, used so brilliantly?)

Jim and James’ skepticism and anxiety around not just finding a partner, but about whether love ever works, or even exists, gives grounding to the nonstop comical bombast, in a way that sneaks up on you.

This is seen best in a series of 10 “frightening possibilities” scenarios, which have Jim and James acting out everything from passive-aggressive shouting fests to going through sickeningly cute cat names.

By Alexis Victoria Hauk for the DCist

Rasmussen...sets the viewer in a rage; and when gentle he calms the room

When Elizabeth and Tom leap at each other to open Skin Tight at The Studio 2ndStage, they’re warning us: love and intensity go hand in hand, and this lyrical, passionate show is about love – real love – so it will be intense.
Skin Tight is one of two one-acts showing as part of Studio 2nd Stage’s sexy, imaginative, and thoroughly engaging Pas de Deux: Plays from New Zealand and Canada. The second piece, 2-2 Tango, was one of the first major successes at The Studio 2ndStage back in 1992.
In Skin Tight by Gary Henderson, Tom and Elizabeth relive their passionate marriage through an emotional duet. Poetic at times, violent at others, the piece reflects a love story from the inside out with intimacy and depth. Director Johanna Gruenhut’s staging is the kind that stays in your memory for a long time to pester and delight.
As Elizabeth, Emily Townley is so natural on stage you believe she’s actually living this frenzied frolic. You’re trespassing in, on tiptoes. She is brutal and biting – literally and figuratively – and so charming we fall in love with her despite the pain she causes, just like her husband does.
Jens Rasmussen matches Townley perfectly as Tom. When he looks at his wife affectionately, we do, too; and when he wants to kill her, we do, too. His physicality when angry sets the viewer in a rage; and when gentle he calms the room.
Watching these two together felt familiar, like looking in on a memory of oneself. Their battles and reconciliation are so true to the experience of love, told with such lyricism and honesty, that at times it felt too painful to watch and at other times glorious. Through Tom and Elizabeth we live out a full love story in an hour or less – an exhausting and cathartic feat.
In 2-2 Tango by Daniel MacIvor – the second one-act of the evening – we meet another couple: James and Jim. Their love story is just as intense, though perhaps not quite as painful as Skin Tight. And while, like Skin Tight, it depicts the brutal nature of intimacy, lust, and loss, it’s also quite funny.
It seems inappropriate to describe Alex Mills, who plays James, separately from Jon Hudson Odom, who plays Jim. Even though they attempt “indenpen-dance” throughout, wanting desperately to express themselves without another person even as they both wish for something deeper, the actors work together entirely as a team, and one’s movement would lose its meaning without the other’s. Both men woo us with perfectly timed expressions and impeccable control of movement.
The shows succeed in part due to the brilliant choreography by Nancy Brannon. The two couples’ stories unfold through chaotic and calculated action that says as much about character as any line in either show. Scenic designer JD Madsen sets the stage for both stories with just enough connection to the literal to keep these poetic pieces grounded. The lighting by Jedidiah Roe is especially well-done and complements the most tragic and, later, most comedic moments of the night.
2-2 Tango is fierce, funny, and heartfelt. Together with Skin Tight, Pas de Deux: Plays from New Zealand and Canada reminds us what love is and what it isn’t, why so many couples don’t make it, and how to appreciate the pain and pleasure of spending life with another person. Take that other person in your life, and see it.

Gorgeous language.. you want to touch or smell or be what’s on the other side of every word.

Jens Rasmussen in Skin Tight
The room is cold, and vapors swirl around the ducts that bring in air — has it been chilled? It smells like what came out of the defroster on my way into the city. Risers on three sides, a platform in the middle covered with Astroturf, an old bathtub on a corner of the platform, buckets hanging from the rafters. Not a space that helps you understand what’s going to happen.

A man and a woman run into the room from opposite sides, collide or embrace, grapple each other onto the platform, struggle, wrestle, rub for a couple of minutes. They knock each other down. They grunt, they kiss, they roll. The woman’s bigger than the man. She gets up, fills her mouth at one of the hanging buckets, spits the water back like a boxer who doesn’t want to carry liquid through the next round, then she goes at him again. Wide face, pretty, flushed, and wet.

More kissing and rubbing than shoving this time. She splashes herself at the bathtub, fishes out a peach, throws her man an apple, eats. In a minute he crosses the knoll and licks the nectar off her face. No one has spoken. What’s there to say?

Love knocks down lucky man and woman; then they devour each other.
That’s the opening sequence in a one-act play called Skin Tight, by a New Zealander named Gary Henderson. It’s the first half of a program The Studio Theatre is offering to celebrate the twenty-fifth anniversary of Studio 2nd Stage, which is “defined by its commitment to taking risks, developing new artists, and producing sexy, daring, and audacious work,” according to the press packet.

I would add the word ‘dangerous.’ At one point she licks his knife as if it were his member. He holds the handle and she takes the blade into her mouth and he moves it in and out, way in, like past her tonsils, then he pushes her around the platform by the handle of the knife. They wrestle with the blade still in her mouth — a real blade: we just saw him cut an apple with it. Then she knocks him down and straddles him and stabs him with the knife. When he screams she tells him to be quiet. “It’s just a flesh wound,” she says. Not like those wounds that go beyond the flesh.

He and she are Jens Rasmussen and Emily Townley. At first their characters appear to be generic love-fighters, incorporations of the love-sex-danger nexus that envelops men and women who surrender to each other. But then we learn their names — Elizabeth and Tom — and we realize that they’re specific people who know each other’s details well enough to treat the buckets hanging from the rafters and the bathtub on the little hill as ordinary features of the inner landscape which their long love and their hunger for each other have configured, like bulldozers might.

The details of their life emerge in gorgeous language, which means that the sounds and shapes and rhythms of the phrases catch your ear and make you want to hear the lines again, as if they were songs on the radio, and that you want to touch or smell or be what’s on the other side of every word. The bathtub and the hanging buckets may be the genius of Set Designer JD Madsen, and the dangerous edge to the erotic wrestling may be the work of Director Johanna Gruenhut, but the language is all Gary Henderson. It makes you wish you’d learned your English in New Zealand.

Elizabeth sits on the edge of the tub and shaves her husband while they talk about the first time they made love. He was afraid he wouldn’t be able to find his way in; she was afraid he wouldn’t fit. Neither of them liked it. He is leaning back between her legs as she cuts the lather off his neck with that knife. Afterwards she wipes him with her dress.

She stretches out on the knoll and remembers the boys who leaned out of the windows of the train that took them off to war, three boys to a window, boney wrists sticking out of the sleeves of their tunics, the arms of men on little boys. They talk about his family’s farm, good wide sunlit country where a man can free his ghosts.

“Will you wash my body when I’m dead?” she asks him. “Not me — I won’t be there — but my body. I don’t want an undertaker’s fingers on my body — or his eyes. What if I’ve soiled my pants? I don’t want someone else to see that dirt.” Makes ‘I love you’ sound about as intimate as ‘What’s your name?’

The story of those people who have loved away the possibility of self-protection is paired with a piece that makes light of our efforts to protect ourselves. 2-2 Tango, by Canadian playwright Daniel MacIvor, is more choreography (by Nancy Bannon) than narrative. Its two characters, James and Jim, literally dance around each other for half an hour. They use words to keep each other at arm’s length, or to approach each other by degrees. Alex Mills and Jon Hudson Odom are beautiful men in beautiful clothes, some of which they take off so we get to see their bodies, which are fine.

They have funny quirks and phobias that serve as obstacles to getting what they want from one another, but they struggle humorously toward the goal of getting laid, and they succeed, I think — one of them insists on turning out the lights so we don’t see what happens, but they both shout, “Jimmy! Jim! Oh, Jim!” in tones that ring with distinctive achievement. They are, in fact, generic characters: anyone could make those sounds, except the people in the other play.

This is The Studio Theatre’s second run at 2-2 Tango, and one can’t help supposing that when it was on this stage before, in 1992, it packed a wilder, riskier punch than it does now, when the gender of the lovers doesn’t make for drama anymore.

Taken together, these two plays show how far we’ve come in understanding love since 1992, and how little we understand it at all.


Rasmussen...utterly convincing


Jens Rasmussen in Skin Tight
“Pas de Duex” at Studio Theatre consists of two short, one act plays. There are supposedly many threads that tie the two plays together thematically, but what I enjoyed were their differences. These pieces hold up just fine as their own islands of artistry. Two plays, each with two actors, each with two wildly opposing tones.The one thing that they do have in common is the wonderfully intimate space on the fourth floor at Studio Theatre. These plays are part of Studio Theatre 2nd Stage, known for more experimental or edgy works. At the farthest point from the stage, you can still see the sly expressions on the actors’ faces, or see a stray drop of spittle fly into the lights during an emotional moment in the action. This isn’t an evening of straining to determine who’s doing what from thirty yards away—it’s a whole different kind of theatre experience, and it’s the perfect setting for these plays, which are:
“Skin Tight” by Gary Henderson, with Emily Townley as Elizabeth and Jens Rasmussen as Tom.

What I loved about this play is how it teases you, giving you no direct information at first, forcing you to pay attention and follow clues. A man and a woman race toward each other on a green hill. As they collide with a thud and start wrestling on the ground, we aren’t sure if this is a violent fight, or old fashioned lover’s play. It turns out to be a little bit of both. They wrestle, then stop, then start over again. As things settle in, we realize that they are a long married couple. Their words to each other are enigmatic and curiously weighted. What the hell is going on here?

Are they on the verge of separating? It seems so, but then there are tender moments where she shaves him, and he bathes her, in an old fashioned bath tub that, without explanation, is also on this hill. They pull out the occasional apple from the tub and shake off the water from it, before slicing and eating it. They also use the water to splash and play and playfully spit it at each other.

Emily Townley and Jens Rasmussen (last seen by this reviewer in ‘Conference Of The Birds’ at Folger Shakespeare Theatre) are utterly convincing as two people who’ve known each other a long time—which isn’t to say that they don’t have secrets which may or may not surprise the other. Their physicality with each other says as much about their relationship as the dialogue. And though their movements are surely choreographed to the teeth—they flow and roll and tumble with naturalistic grace and believable clumsiness.

Although it may seem a challenge to be given only gradually peeled bits of information, by the time the play reaches its unexpected conclusion, you realize the characters have stolen your heart. Don’t be surprised to find a lump in your throat. The final moments of the play have both actors completely nude and vulnerable. It’s a beautiful scene, played without a hint of self-consciousness.

INTERMISSION

“2-2 Tango” by Daniel MacIvor, with Jon Hudson Odom (Jim) and Alex Mills (James).
Two tuxedo-clad men catch each other’s eyes across a club’s dance floor. There’s an unmistakable attraction that each hopes, and mostly fears, might lead to something more “serious.” In “2-2 Tango,” the dances known as flirtation and mating are stepped out with pointed toes and funny lines. The action follows Alex Mills (so great in Shakespeare’s R&J) as James and John Hudson Odom as Jim. And, yes, just their introductions to each other, with their same-ish names, induces a chuckle.

The territory is familiar—is a one night stand the worst thing? Maybe it’s the best thing. And, “Oh God, what happens if we actually move in together?” Many of the laughs come from the near-slapstick choreography that accompanies their first night together. One likes the lights on, the other likes the dark—the way the characters use two-claps to turn the lights on and off (remember “The Clapper” on the late night TV commercials?) draws the biggest laughs.
The highlight is this couples’ “Ten Frightening Possibilities” list that they each act out with hilarious results. The overall themes and worries and delights are applicable to anyone, regardless of their sexual orientation, but that’s not to say that the play completely ignores certain elements that would be unique to a couple like this.

Two quibbles: a boy who delivers a watermelon ( a watermelon which reappears one too many times) doesn’t work. Yes, it surely has a greater symbolic meaning, but I was more interested in having fun than figuring out the metaphor. And much of the dialogue is delivered in unison, in a sing-songy way that a choreographer might use to keep everyone in time. A little of that goes a long way.

But the actors have an easy chemistry and are well matched. Odom goes a bit lighter—smiling or faux-stuttering (a tiny bit) for a comedic affect that works.

After tears, then laughter, you’ll leave Studio Theatre feeling as if you’ve seen something new. Or at least in a new setting.


Rasmussen gives a breathtaking (and incredibly carnal) performance.

Studio Theatre’s intimate Studio 2nd Stage is throwing itself one hell of a sexy party for it’s 25th Anniversary.  Currently staging 2 one-act plays, both choreographed by award winning choreographer and dancer Nancy Bannon, Pas de Deux is risky theater at its best – no emotion held back, no move over-staged, and nothing off limits.  The plays – Skin Tight and 2-2 Tango – both focus heavily on movement and human connection and each does so in such a steamy and sensual way that it had me wishing 2nd Stage turned 25 every day of the week.
Skin Tight, written by Gary Henderson and directed by Johanna Gruenhut, doesn’t so much fill the relatively small space upstairs at Studio as it does completely take it over and nearly thrusts the audience against the walls with its intensity.  Storming onto the stage, Elizabeth and Tom (played with jaw-dropping chemistry by Emily Townley and Jens Rasmussen) wrestle (literally and figuratively) with the memories of their married life – the ups and downs, the passion, the anger, the blame and the bliss that have defined their lives together.  Driven by desire and nostalgia, their story unfolds to expose a tender, undying love for one another that survives periods of dispute, disdain, distance and even death.  The beauty of Skin Tight is found just as much in its physical movements as in its script, and Townley and Rasmussen give a breathtaking (and incredibly carnal) performance.
2-2 Tango follows an interracial couple as they go through the stages of a relationship like so many steps of a dance.  Written by Daniel MacIvor and directed by Eric Ruffin, the humorous and heartbreaking second play in the Pas de Deux duo is a perfect compliment to its partner at Studio, and beautifully continues the kinetic energy kick started by Skin Deep.  Intoxicated by the primal thrill of attraction, Jim (Jon Odom) and James (Alex Mills) first find themselves enthralled and then find themselves making excuses – once the initial high wears off, the fears of commitment and actually falling in love have them both side stepping rather than give away their hearts.  Odom and Mills are a perfect pair for this racy pass around the dance floor - and I have to mention the fantastic lighting that seemed to follow with perfect timing on every step (both plays were done by lighting designer Jedidiah Roe).  Tango is a bittersweet dance – and we all know the moves by heart.

Rasmussen explodes onto the stage

Jens Rasmussen in Skin Tight
If relationships can be traced in the landscape of two joined bodies, then the two plays in Pas De Deux explore those landscapes with an honesty that is both mesmerizing and, at times, disturbing to watch. From the opening moment, when Emily Townley and Jens Rasmussen explode onto the stage in a violent wrestling match, grabbing onto each other’s flesh, you know this will be a no-holds barred evening in theatre.

Both plays deal with the intimate relationships of two people shown through a physicalized theatre style that borrows from dance, play, stage combat and yes, well, sex. The actors all seem comfortable in their bodies and are skillful enough to throw themselves into all the physical techniques and rhythms that these shows demand.

However, that’s where the similarities end. The plays have two very different energies and arcs indeed.

Skin Tight, written by Gary Henderson, feels like a very old play – not old as in old-fashioned but old as in wise and well lived. It takes the audience on a journey through a relationship that, one discovers, has lasted a lifetime between a man and a woman. As we listen in on their conversation, they reveal these are two people who know everything about the other, what turns them on and what breaks them up, and the characters Elizabeth and Tom don’t hold back from using both extremes of communication.

The “truth” about their relationship unfolds slowly. We learn in bits and pieces that they have grown up together, known each other since childhood, that they have lived on a farm, that they’ve lost the farm, and had a daughter together who is now grown up.  Imbedded in the story is a dark mystery, something powerful that threatens to tear them apart, and when the truth finally breaks open, it is heartbreaking indeed.

Their world is defined by a raked rectangle covered in what looks like emerald grass. The actors sprawl on this barefoot and so close to the audience in Studio Theater’s Second Stage that if you look up with them you can imagine also lying on a meadow sharing an enormous sky.  In this “field” sits an old abandoned bathtub.

Set designer JD Madsen has also chosen to feature a simple rectangle in 2-2 Tango, but here the rectangle is sunken slightly. The floor is parquet and serves as a dance floor in a dance club, someone’s living room space, and an unidentified urban street. Two windows of plexiglass are at times lit from behind for a bit of silhouette work or pulse with colored lights to indicate a fast-paced urban world.

2-2 Tango feels young, edgy, a little cynical. The play traces an impulsive rollercoaster ride from hookup to break up of two young men.

The language of these two plays also differs greatly.  In Skin Tight, Henderson is working through what is a memory play and has chosen to have the characters indulge in long monologues that lift off from prosaic dialogue into almost poetic flight.  Actors Emily Townley and Jens Rasmussen only occasionally exhibit a bit of strain in a few awkward, self-conscious passages. For the most part their voices rise and fall in well-synced murmuring, an undulating stream-of-consciousness sharing.

In 2-2 Tango, playwright Daniel MacIvor has created a script marked by terse phrases, delivered in rapid-fire succession that are sometimes repeated simultaneously such as this in staccato,  “This is a dance. This is an independ-dance!” The play is arranged in cropped scenelets, each with a different structure and rhythm – much like a piece of contemporary music. Alex Mills and Jon Hudson Odom never miss a beat of this demanding “score.”

The performances throughout the evening are outstanding, especially in the physical realm. Townley has a strong and generous physique that she uses to great advantage in portraying the character of Elizabeth, a woman of earthy and aggressively animal appetites. The way her bare legs plant themselves as she walks reminds me of the great roles and physicalizations of actress Colleen Dewhurst – say as Josie in Moon for the Misbegotten.

Jens Rasmussen with his reedy physique seems at first no match for this feisty woman, so full of life and longings, but as they roll around together, fight, and make up, we see an extraordinary couple grappling together through whatever life dishes them, and learn that, no matter what, they will stay in the ring. There is one scene that starts like a modern interpretation of the famous eating scene in the film Tom Jones where these two actors establish their two characters by eating apples – she digging her teeth in deeply to the juicy flesh, he paring away neat slices with a knife. But its lusty humor turns to something both chilling and thrilling when she covers the sharp knife with her mouth and Tom steers her around the floor by turning the sharp blade.

Alex Mills is an actor who we’ve come to expect to deliver enormous range and control in his physicality, and in 2-2 Tango he doesn’t disappoint. Mostly known for his silent work affiliated with Synetic Theatre Company, he has stepped into some notable speaking roles recently.  But this was my first time hearing his voice, and it was an experience close to what it must have been like in Hollywood emerging from the silent film age with the advent of talkies. And I am pleased to report that Mills has made the transition with more grace and vocal abilities than many of Hollywood’s silent screen stars. Moreover, he is a fearless performer – from his whiplash-like isolations and erotic gyrations to the quixotic changes of emotions and drilling dialogue – and wows us throughout the show.

Mills and Jon Hudson Odom are well-paired indeed. Odom matches Mills in his lithe, expressive body, and he slams words across the space at Mills who bats them back as in a tennis match.  Odom expresses well the terror of a man more comfortable in a dance club than sitting chatting in his own home. His portrayal is both humorous and sympathetic.
Frankly, in this play, I wish their characters had had more guts than the actors demonstrated playing them.  Of course, there were powerful universal truths in the expression of relationships (straight or gay, young or old) about stages of attraction, awkward individual rules of undressing, lust, boredom, restlessness, whining, and desiring to wound. One of my favorite scenes in MacIvor’s play is when these two men, who’ve barely just met, imagine all the things that might go wrong to upend their relationship and, in quick-by-numbers fashion, the two men act these out. It’s riotously funny and wincingly familiar.

But beneath the bravado poses and cool dance pick-up moves, we get to see glimpses of these two men as vulnerable, lonely, and hungry to launch themselves in a more satisfying relationship. Would that the play had risked more in this direction.

2-2 Tango skirts away from the depth and scary places Skin Tight eventually goes to and, as such, risks being vastly entertaining but finally just clever.

Directors Johanna Greuenhut (Skin Tight) and Eric Ruffin (2-2 Tango) and choreographer Nancy Bannon  have developed wonderful trust in their small ensembles.  They’ve brought out to varying degrees in their respective plays the baring of souls.  InSkin Tight, the play actually calls for one character to undress fully.  For some people, this vulnerable display of an aging body will seem a natural extension of the final situation in the play. For others, the nudity will shock or distract them from even hearing the final scene.

In realty, to all intent and purposes, the performers have been baring themselves to us all evening in painfully honest and human ways.  The final image of the evening has young Dolan-Sandrino holding up a tray of watermelon slices to the audience as if to ask us, are we going to dig in and suck life’s juices, however messy? This moment shows how theatre, at its best, holds the mirror up and passes the choice to us.


Rasmussen... leads us on a journey that's intense and emotional, raw and human.

It can be a bit of a gamble to present multiple plays in one evening of theatre. There's always a question of whether the two (or more) plays need to have a common theme or another element, which ties them together. It may not always be necessary, but in this case Studio Theatre's 2nd Stage Division hits the jackpot in finding two plays that not only explore common themes present in adult sexual relationships, but are also of equal quality. Visceral, evocative, and charged with energy, New Zealand's Gary Henderson's Skin Tight and Canada's Daniel MacIvor's 2-2 Tango - both of which comprise Studio 2nd Stage's Pas de Deux theatrical event - stand fine on their own but are even better as a pair.

Skin Tight focuses on Elizabeth (Emily Townley) and Tom's (Jens Rasmussen) marriage - warts and all. When we first meet them, they are engaged in combat - of sorts - on a grassy mat. Through sharp movement (choreographed by Nancy Bannon with assistance from Graham Brown) and even (at times) more pointed dialogue, they explore the ups and downs of their longstanding relationship. Moments of anger quickly turn into sexual encounters in the blink of an eye. Moments of tenderness quickly fade to showcase each person's dark secrets and fears. In this play, superbly directed by Johanna Gruenhut, notions of time and space are thrown out, but Henderson's exquisitely constructed play leading to a largely unexpected reveal in the final moments (with some assistance Ken Vest, a mysterious man) is more straightforward than we might initially be led to believe. A heartbreaking and fearless Emily Townley who meets her acting match in Jens Rasmussen, leads us (together with Rasmussen) on a journey that's intense and emotional, raw and human.

Daniel MacIvor's seamless 2-2 Tango is not a new piece to longtime Studio 2nd Stage audiences - in fact it was an early hit - but it's no less of a powerful experience than Skin Tight. James (Alex Mills) and Jim (Jon Hudson Odom) may not have the long history that Elizabeth and Tom do. Further, their relationship may be depicted in less intense ways, but their struggles, fears, and connections are no less real and emotionally-charged. Using precise and well-executed movements that incorporate elements of formal dance (also choreographed by Bannon/Brown), the equally matched actors/dancers play out - with much charm and charisma - a relationship in the modern era. In this Eric Ruffin-directed play, it's not possible to sidestep (so to speak) the important issues; they must be faced head on even as we try as hard as possible to avoid confrontation. Aided by a mysterious boy (Maceo Dolan-Sandrino) they are able to identify and define their connections to one another in a way that might not always be possible with just words/direct conversation.

Language and movement are the centerpieces of both plays, but minimal production values reinforce the ideas found within them without being a distraction. JD Madsen's scenic designs - rudimentary and bright in Skin Tight and modern and pristine in 2-2 Tango - are utilitarian for these movement-based pieces, while highlighting the kinds of figurative worlds that the characters inhabit. Jedidiah Roe's lighting design is particularly interesting in 2-2 Tango. Enhancing the already performance-like mood of the piece, it's an example of lighting being innovative without being too gimmicky. Kelsey Hunt's (Skin Tight) and Rebecca DeLapp's (2-2 Tango) costumes, like Madsen's sets provide insight into the 'worlds' - whether actual or not - that our duos inhabit. James Bigbee Garver's varied sound design adds further ambient information.

A highly theatrical pair of plays, they offer valuable insight into the nature of adult relationships of many sorts. Intense and thought-provoking, they're definitely something to see.


Rasmussen: Simply Mesmerizing

Jens Rasmussen in Conference of the Birds
“The way is open but there is neither traveler nor guide.” That is the closing statement and tagline of Folger Theatre’s production of The Conference of the Birds. Based on the poem by Farid Uddi Attar the stage version is written by Jean-Claude Carrière and Peter Brook. Directed by Aaron Posner this production is a flurry of interpretive dance and movement mingled with the brilliant audio creations of Helen Hayes Award-winning Composer Tom Teasley. The Conference of the Birds allows you to ponder the greater meanings of life along its spiritual and metaphysical journeys and paths.

Scenic Designer Meghan Raham creates a simplistic approach to lining the stage of the Folger for the production. With long stripes of bark-like brownness hanging from the ceiling the stage is reminiscent of a forest or some other wooded gathering where the birds of the world might congregate. Interspersed with columns and backdrops of mirrored surfaces, the set is completed in its mythic proportions with the notions of Lighting Designer Jennifer Schriever. Over two dozen bulbs of various size and shape are hung at various lengths from the ceiling down over the stage and out over the audience, hints and shadows of fireflies or other natural light sources found in the Avian kingdom.

Costume Designer Olivera Gajic takes a similarly minimalist approach to her designs, creating the great birds of the world in shades of grays, browns and subtle shifts in earthy tones like green. This was both a great disappointment and a clever tactic to instill upon the performance. By limiting the physical appearance of the bird’s costumes it ensures the audience must not only imagine their great plumage but rely heavily upon the actor’s physical gestures and embodiments of their avian bird of choice. We do see a hint of color when defining the Peacock and her proud colorful feathers, but outside of this, the rags of dirt and clay coloring leave much to the imagination.

Director Aaron Posner working with Choreographer Erika Chong Shuch crafts moments of intense beauty upon the stage in their execution of exploratory movement. Many of the dances are not dances so much as they are representations of excursions or other parts of the poem as the tale unfolds. Shuch offers a unique approach to the dance work in this production as all of the steps and movements are meant to be performed not by ordinary humans but by humans embodying both physically and mentally the spirit of birds. His casting choices are more than appropriate, picking the smallest of the cast, Britt Duff, as the sparrow; a long elegant and limber body to play the Heron (Tiffany Rachelle Stewart) and a bulky muscular fellow to play the Falcon (Jay Dunn).

Posney’s consistency with the adaptation of human to bird is wavering. At the beginning of the performance when it is quite clear the actors upon stage each represent a great bird of the world, they do so flawlessly. Jutting necks, twitches of the face and head, as well as strutting limbs and ruffled arms to imitate wings; all of these gestures and many more create live birds on the stage from these 11 performers without the aid of fancy costumes or real feathers. The contrast as these “birds” become humans during the Hoopoe’s tales is sharp and clearly defined. The problem comes late in the story, as the birds make their journey across the seven valleys toward the mighty bird king.

After the intermission the actors lose their bird-like qualities and momentum. We no longer see them twitching their heads about like the curious birds from the first half, or scrunching their physical form to look more like the avian counterparts they are portraying. What we do see is weary actors on stage. And while the characters at this point are meant to be exhausted as their perilous journey continues, seeing them completely lose touch with their inner bird is disheartening and disappointing.

The acting is stupendous. The only person who never acts like a bird is the Hoopoe (Patty Gallagher). While she is the leader of the birds gathered and often the narrative story teller among them, seeing her acting as a normal human with no bird like movements or qualities was confusing but not in an enigmatic sense, only a disproportionate one. Gallagher’s performance is engaging, each story she alights to the stage is crisp and brilliant as if being told for the very first time, and her rallying spirit to guide the birds to action is afresh with vigor and lightning.

While each of the birds makes an entertaining appearance, like the Parrot (Robert Barry Fleming) when he shows jittery nerves about leaving his cage, or the Peacock (Jessica Frances Dukes) when she shows up larger than life to squawk, strut her stuff, and show off her colors; the best performances come from these actors when they shed their feathers and slip into the Hoopoe’s stories as humans. The most specific example of this is when the Magpie (Jens Rasmussen) and the Heron (Tiffany Rachelle Stewart) engage in a dreamlike sequence as a princess and slave who share a passionate evening together. Stewart and Rasmussen’s bodies entwine to a sultry beat during an exploratory piece of dance-like movement that is simply mesmerizing; every eye in the house glued to them, entranced upon their physical expressions to the point where the Hoopoe’s narrations are almost completely drowned away in the background.

Mingling with the incredible orchestrations of Tom Teasley is the Nightingale (Annapurna Sriram) and her beautifully haunting song. Sriram plays a small guitar and sings a siren’s song throughout the piece, echoing her voice like the nightingale she portrays with a sweet sorrow. Often joined by others in song, including Britt Duff, Jessica Frances Dukes, and Celeste Jones, the pristine voices of these lady-birds will melt your heart, especially when Duff takes to singing in the valley of love.

The music never misses a beat throughout the production. Teasley’s wild orchestrations are primal in nature and echo cries of these birds without falling into the generic hackneyed trap of bird calling. His rhythms are fierce and drive many of dance numbers with a raucous beat and wild feeling of freedom behind them. Teasley’s composition sounds as if it were derived from the very spirit of the earth; echoing a time of nature with the reality of the world of these birds.

If you can find no other reason to see this production, seeing Tom Teasley in action and hearing his magnificent music is definitely cause to do so.